Continuous Monitoring for
Old Woman Creek Estuary

2024 Watershed Report Card
Current Assessment
Based on monthly grab samples collected Apr–Nov by OWC Reserve staff and Erie Conservation District volunteers. Continuous Lume monitoring would provide 15-minute resolution to refine these grades.
C
Creek Grade
Excessive nutrients & sediment runoff from 66% agricultural land use
B
Estuary Grade
Wetland filtering effect measurably improves water quality downstream
?
With Continuous Monitoring
15-min Lume TLF data would capture E. coli dynamics, storm pulses, and diurnal patterns that monthly grab sampling misses
Monitoring Network
Proposed Lume Deployment Sites
Ten stations along the creek-to-lake transect and tributaries, co-located with existing SWMP infrastructure. Each Lume sensor uses tryptophan-like fluorescence (TLF) to estimate E. coli concentrations at 15-minute intervals, with supporting turbidity and temperature readings.
Station Details
Site-by-Site Overview
Synthetic 48-hour continuous data based on published watershed report card findings and SWMP parameters. Primary metric is E. coli (cfu/100mL) estimated via TLF, with supporting turbidity and temperature readings.
Sensor Validation
Lume TLF vs. Colilert Lab Validation
Lume sensors use tryptophan-like fluorescence (TLF) to estimate E. coli in real time. Validation against IDEXX Colilert lab samples would be performed at all 10 stations, building on the Boulder Creek pilot (R² = 0.67, 92% classification accuracy, 334 paired samples).
>0.85
Target R² (TLF vs. Colilert, based on Boulder Creek pilot)
200+
Target paired samples (across 10 sites, one season)
>90%
Risk category accuracy target (Safe / Caution / High)
Projected TLF vs. Colilert Correlation
Synthetic paired measurements showing expected agreement between Lume TLF estimate and IDEXX Colilert lab analysis for E. coli
E. coli Geomean by Station
Synthetic season geometric means across the creek-to-lake transect, with supporting turbidity and temperature averages
Real-Time Alerts
What Automated Monitoring Would Flag
Synthetic alert feed demonstrating the types of notifications Lume sensors would generate for reserve staff and watershed managers.
Project Details
Deployment Concept

Project Partners

  • OWC Reserve: ODNR Division of Wildlife — site access, SWMP co-location, validation
  • Virridy: Evan Thomas + Field Team — Lume deployment & data platform
  • Erie Conservation District: Watershed monitoring, volunteer coordination
  • Friends of Old Woman Creek: Community engagement & outreach
  • Ohio EPA: 303(d) impairment assessment support

Concept Budget

  • Lume sensor deployment (10 devices @ $2,400/yr) $24,000
  • SWMP co-location & EXO2 validation sampling $12,000
  • Dashboard development & data integration $5,000
  • Storm event rapid-response sampling $6,000
  • Total Year 1 $47,000

Deliverables

  • Real-time estuary health dashboard for reserve staff & researchers
  • Automated hypoxia & turbidity spike alerts
  • Storm event nutrient pulse quantification
  • Wetland filtering efficiency reports (inflow vs. outflow)
  • H2Ohio BMP effectiveness data — linking conservation practices to water quality
  • End-of-season validation report: Lume vs. EXO2 correlation analysis

Proposed Timeline

  • Jan–Feb 2027: Site assessment, SWMP co-location planning, ODNR permitting
  • Mar 2027: Lume deployment & calibration at 10 SWMP stations
  • Mar–Dec 2027: Full monitoring season, parallel with SWMP sondes & grab sampling
  • Jan–Mar 2028: Analysis, validation report, H2Ohio integration memo